modern vehicles not radio friendly
- army1975
- Donor
- Posts: 807
- Joined: November 1st, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Handle: Proud American
- Real Name: Keith Goodman
- Antenna: Wilson 5000
- Radio: Galaxy DX-979
- Contact:
modern vehicles not radio friendly
Read an article that states that "Any vehicle manufactured in the last 15-20 years--and anything new--is packed with electronics--relays, microprocessors, switches, sensors, and the wiring harnesses connecting all this stuff. If you screw up one sensor, you could kill the engine and let yourself in for a big repair bill. Remember--a radio is going to be transmitting a relatively powerful signal. They may be enough radio frequency energy to cause real problems with automotive electronics is that energy gets into the wiring, sensors, microprocessors, etc., also vehicles with airbags, the airbags could explode open." My vehicle, a 2002 Buick Century, has all said stuff. I am installing the Galaxy DX-979, tuned and peaked, wiring it directly to the battery. Are there any danger of my vehicle being in danger of said stuff in article?
CB Handle: PROUD AMERICAN
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
- MDYoungblood
- Site Admin
- Posts: 10740
- Joined: June 12th, 2010, 8:05 pm
- Handle: MDYoungblood
- Real Name: Gregory
- Antenna: HyGain AV-6160
- Radio: Icom IC-746 (non pro)
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
I don't think you will have a problem, for one the airbags need a frontal collision to deploy, the sensor is electronic but only senses impact. There could be some ignition problems, I bought a 02 Chevy Malibu for my daughter to drive, (same car, same engine), and the slightly modded CB (E.F. Johnson Viking 4740) in it did just fine. It would be wise to add some bonding to the hood, trunk lid, etc. if none is present, make sure the wire connections are tight, especially to the throttle body, (found that was one problem with her car), the drain for the cowl was plugged and the interior would get wet, cleaned it out and ended that problem. I used a trunk lid antenna mount and the Hustler Hi-Q 27 center load antenna and the radio wired direct to the battery.
3's
Greg
3's
Greg
"321, West Manchester Township, PA"
Official Moderator - CBRT Complaint Department
- jessejamesdallas
- Donor
- Posts: 6284
- Joined: October 10th, 2004, 7:02 pm
- Handle: Jesse James Dallas
- Real Name: Jesse
- Radio: working
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
No more power than what a Factory Galaxy 979 put's out, you'll be fine. Where you start to run into problems with Newer Vehicles is when you start adding Amplifiers to the mix...Once you start getting over the 400w mark, then you can start getting RFI issues with the cars electronics.
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
- army1975
- Donor
- Posts: 807
- Joined: November 1st, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Handle: Proud American
- Real Name: Keith Goodman
- Antenna: Wilson 5000
- Radio: Galaxy DX-979
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
thanks for the info.army1975 wrote:Read an article that states that "Any vehicle manufactured in the last 15-20 years--and anything new--is packed with electronics--relays, microprocessors, switches, sensors, and the wiring harnesses connecting all this stuff. If you screw up one sensor, you could kill the engine and let yourself in for a big repair bill. Remember--a radio is going to be transmitting a relatively powerful signal. They may be enough radio frequency energy to cause real problems with automotive electronics is that energy gets into the wiring, sensors, microprocessors, etc., also vehicles with airbags, the airbags could explode open." My vehicle, a 2002 Buick Century, has all said stuff. I am installing the Galaxy DX-979, tuned and peaked, wiring it directly to the battery. Are there any danger of my vehicle being in danger of said stuff in article?
-- Monday, 12 December 2016, 18:00 PM --
good to know. had me worried there for a New York year when read that. thanks for the info..jessejamesdallas wrote:No more power than what a Factory Galaxy 979 put's out, you'll be fine. Where you start to run into problems with Newer Vehicles is when you start adding Amplifiers to the mix...Once you start getting over the 400w mark, then you can start getting RFI issues with the cars electronics.
CB Handle: PROUD AMERICAN
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
You can run a lot of power in a modern vehicle but you have to follow the rules. Proper antenna install, use a common mode choke of some kind, no hacked radios and use decent amplifiers that are not overdriven. Goes against everything some CBers stand for.
I used to have a lot of issues running a 4 pill. With a proper install I now run a 16 pill and do not bleed on the stereo. It took me a long time to see the light.
I used to have a lot of issues running a 4 pill. With a proper install I now run a 16 pill and do not bleed on the stereo. It took me a long time to see the light.
- army1975
- Donor
- Posts: 807
- Joined: November 1st, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Handle: Proud American
- Real Name: Keith Goodman
- Antenna: Wilson 5000
- Radio: Galaxy DX-979
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
thanks for the info. but don't need no shoe for what I use the radio for. just tuned and peaked. mag. mount Wilson 5000 dead center on the roof of the vehicle. lol, when it comes to pills, only thing I know about pills is the 8 I have to take everyday.543FtWorth wrote:You can run a lot of power in a modern vehicle but you have to follow the rules. Proper antenna install, use a common mode choke of some kind, no hacked radios and use decent amplifiers that are not overdriven. Goes against everything some CBers stand for.
I used to have a lot of issues running a 4 pill. With a proper install I now run a 16 pill and do not bleed on the stereo. It took me a long time to see the light.
CB Handle: PROUD AMERICAN
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
- 443 Arizona
- Mod Duck
- Posts: 894
- Joined: April 29th, 2010, 2:22 pm
- Handle: Double R
- Real Name: Steve
- Radio: madison on 5/8 wave
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
haha, dont worry Keith, Gm has to put that disclaimer in all their vehicles, and in CA it may cause cancer,
but if something did happen, dont let the govmnt know cause then they will either ban cb's or buicks
but if something did happen, dont let the govmnt know cause then they will either ban cb's or buicks
- 295 antenna
- Moderator
- Posts: 2019
- Joined: October 23rd, 2016, 10:45 pm
- Handle: 2950 or 295
- Real Name: Charles Reney
- Antenna: patriot, Discone
- Radio: Stryker 955 , Browning Mark iv
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
I have a ford c-max hybrid and im afraid to install a radio ,nothing much just a peaked and tweaked a little (10 ) watts) because of the electronics. Any body know of some one running a cb in a hybrid ?
Keep smiling ...It makes people wonder what your up too !
American eagle SSB group : AE1577
TWRC - The world radio group : WR2950
world wide sidebanders - WWS2950
American eagle SSB group : AE1577
TWRC - The world radio group : WR2950
world wide sidebanders - WWS2950
- army1975
- Donor
- Posts: 807
- Joined: November 1st, 2012, 10:21 pm
- Handle: Proud American
- Real Name: Keith Goodman
- Antenna: Wilson 5000
- Radio: Galaxy DX-979
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
man, took a load off my mind. had me all kind of worried.443 Arizona wrote:haha, dont worry Keith, Gm has to put that disclaimer in all their vehicles, and in CA it may cause cancer,
but if something did happen, dont let the govmnt know cause then they will either ban cb's or buicks
CB Handle: PROUD AMERICAN
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.......Our Loss Will Not Be FORGOTTEN
Veteran: Field Artillery. M40, 155 MM self-propelled howitzer. Bamberg, West Germany, 1975 - 1977.....HOOAH!!
- Mr Bow Tie
- NEW DUCK
- Posts: 1
- Joined: January 1st, 2017, 6:44 pm
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
I was also wondering about this. I'm looking at putting a Stryker SR-497-HPC in a 16 Silverado. Was also concerned about electronics on the truck.
- milkman21218
- Donor
- Posts: 117
- Joined: November 11th, 2012, 5:07 am
- Handle: Milkman
- Real Name: Izzy
- Call Sign: W1ASA
- Antenna: Many
- Radio: Many
- Contact:
Re: modern vehicles not radio friendly
3 of my Ham Radio Club have Toyota Prius which is a Hybrid. And they all have some type of radio in them. From 50watt FM VHF/UHF FM to a 100watt Yaesu FT-857 HF rig with no problems. So you should be just fine with a CB.295 antenna wrote:I have a ford c-max hybrid and im afraid to install a radio ,nothing much just a peaked and tweaked a little (10 ) watts) because of the electronics. Any body know of some one running a cb in a hybrid ?
Central Maryland
73
73